Are there reasons why liquidity in pools differs?

Surely everyone who provides liquidity to pools has noticed that some pools have no liquidity, while others have a lot. There are many reasons for the lack of liquidity or its abundance, but now I will discuss the main ones.

There are many liquidity pools on the $TON blockchain. Those who supply liquidity to pools are called liquidity providers, and those who make trades thanks to the liquidity in the pool are called traders.
STON fi offers incentives to increase interest rates and liquidity.
One of the main reasons is the launch of the ‘FARMNING’ system, which allows liquidity providers to receive additional tokens while the system is active.
For example, this system is currently active on STON fi in the following pool:

$STORM / $TON 28%

In addition to the obvious factors of this system, there are others.
Basically, when tokens are hyped and popular among the community at the very beginning of listing, many people send tokens from their wallets to liquidity pools, which increases liquidity in the pool but decreases the interest rate due to high liquidity.

The opposite is also true. If liquidity is low, then if you swap tokens in a liquidity pool with low liquidity, there may be slippage in your trade.
This is because slippage occurs when the user has not set an acceptable slippage limit and the DEX offers a trade with high slippage . This rarely happens on STON fi , but it can happen on any DEX.

Liquidity pools with high liquidity on STON fi:

$TON / $USDT 16%
$BLUM / $TON 10%